If a judge enters a final judgment in a given case declaring an executive order unconstitutional, the administration may not ...

In the end, the Supreme Court’s so-called “shadow docket” is neither new nor nefarious. It is a necessary and long-standing part of the court’s responsibility to manage the flow of emergency legal ...

As the executive branch continues to test the boundaries of its authority with increasing brazenness, a growing number of federal judges have responded with remarkable clarity and courage. Their ...

Federal judges are increasingly ruling against the Trump administration’s agenda and in defiance of Supreme Court orders. The ...

President Donald Trump's executive order has faced repeated roadblocks, but the administration continues appealing up to the Supreme Court.

Appeals court to review Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling narrowed lower courts' ability to issue universal injunctions.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday defended the way the Supreme Court is handling the flood of emergency cases that has ...

These cases have involved his move to restrict automatic birthright citizenship ... In a dissent, liberal Justice Elena Kagan said the decision "all but overturned" a 1935 Supreme Court precedent ...

One benefit of birthright citizenship is its egalitarian simplicity: The only thing most people need to prove that they’re American is a birth certificate.

The decision, authored by Justice Barrett, did not address validity of birthright citizenship, an issue that remains under adjudication in numerous lower courts.

Several lower courts have again granted injunctions in cases challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order that purported to end birthright citizenship.

That June 27 decision’s effect on his proposed lifting of birthright citizenship is still working its way through lower courts. Sotomayor and Jackson have routinely protested in provocative terms.