The task of interpreting the law is inherently “political.” But no justice has been this comfortable saying so in public.

The justices’ decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services is the culmination of a decades-long conservative push to hollow out federal civil rights laws.

On Monday, in an unsigned, one-paragraph order, the Supreme Court’s six conservatives allowed President Donald Trump to functionally dismantle the Department of Education. The Court’s shadow docket ...

Earlier this week, all fifteen federal district judges in Maryland received a summons in a civil lawsuit: The U.S. Department of Justice is suing the state’s entire federal district court in ...

Kamala Harris and Cory Booker each took moments to celebrate at the final Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation vote.

Why did Gorsuch claim that ‘Pride Puppy’, an alphabet book about a lost dog, introduces kids to bondage and sex workers? Let’s find out!

A former public defender's employment discrimination case highlights gaps in protections that the Judiciary Accountability Act would address.

'Dinners With Ruth' is Nina Totenberg's reflections on decades of friendship with a Supreme Court justice she covered for a living.

Some of Project 2025’s most unhinged policy positions arise directly out of the Republican Supreme Court justices’ recent handiwork.

Noah Feldman believes the legal system is up to the task of constraining Donald Trump. The evidence suggests otherwise.

On Friday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Trump v. CASA, a case that is both generally about the authority of courts to rein in executive lawlessness, and also specifically about the ...

Jonathan Mitchell, the lawyer who crafted Texas's anti-choice bounty hunter law, is now involved in every other culture war Fox News covers.