McBratney and Draper judicially pierced the Tribal-federal enclave and categorically injected state authority onto Tribal lands. States retain exclusive jurisdiction over non-Indians who victimize non ...

In this response, I suggest that while Khan and her co-authors are on the right track, even their ambitious vision may not be ambitious enough. The problem with the notice and consent paradigm isn’t ...

Montana v. US is a case about tribal civil jurisdiction. Yet it has had a second life in a surprising context: federal statutes of general applicability that do not mention tribes. This Comment ...

Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive ac ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray ...

Although appealing in its simplicity, the authors’ bottom line is dead wrong. This Essay responds with three principal objections. First, the sentence-reduction statute falls comfortably within ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray and James Pfander often disagree about judicial ...

Within the context of government grants to private entities conditioned on restrictions of speech, scholars and courts have been grasping for something like an extension of Dole’s independent ...

by Sonia Mittal onJuly 22, 2025 Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive actions are part of a ...