Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive ac ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray and James Pfander often disagree about judicial ...

Although appealing in its simplicity, the authors’ bottom line is dead wrong. This Essay responds with three principal objections. First, the sentence-reduction statute falls comfortably within ...

As part of Stanford Law Review's 2023 Symposium on Access to Justice, this Essay explains how medical-legal partnerships--community-based program ...

But a word might be invoked more frequently in one sense than another for reasons that have little to do with the common understanding of that word. More specifically, the frequency with which a word ...

Because of Bruen, the Third Circuit expressly discounted the more than 80 earlier precedents upholding the felon-in-possession ban: Of course, a court might have scrutinized whether a particular group ...

Volume 68 May 2015 Essay Substantive Due Process as a Two-Way Street How the Court Can Reconcile Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty Mark L. Rienzi * ...

The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.