In this response, I suggest that while Khan and her co-authors are on the right track, even their ambitious vision may not be ambitious enough. The problem with the notice and consent paradigm isn’t ...

Introduction In The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet, Orin Kerr highlights several important Fourth Amendment questions that few courts have addressed. But in “offer[ing] a general framework ...

The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary ...

Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive ac ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray ...

In short, even successful individualized litigation may fail to arrest Trump’s profound threat to the American legal profession’s independence and integrity. Fortunately, there’s a simple and powerful ...

Within the context of government grants to private entities conditioned on restrictions of speech, scholars and courts have been grasping for something like an extension of Dole’s independent ...

EO 14230 is not merely bureaucratic overreach; it is, as Judge Howell suggested during the initial hearing, a directive that “puts the cart before the horse” and mirrors “what happened during the Red ...